Powered by momentummedia
Adviser Innovation logo
Advisor Inovation logo
Stay connected
Subscribe to the Adviser Innovation eNewsletter.
Advisers encouraged to consider tele-underwriting

Advisers encouraged to consider tele-underwriting

author image
By Scott Hodder ·
December 22 2015

Advisers encouraged to consider tele-underwriting

Centrepoint Alliance is encouraging financial advisers across its network to use tele-underwriting for insurance applications, arguing that it will markedly improve efficiency. 

Advisers encouraged to consider tele-underwriting
nestegg logo

Speaking to Adviser Innovation sister title, ifa, Centrepoint Alliance's national risk manager, David Spiteri, said advisers are dedicating considerable time to completing risk insurance applications, meaning they have less time to work on other areas of their business, such as sourcing new clients.

"Generally, when you do an application for a client - whether it is [straightforward] or very complex - the average insurance case will take about 10 hours to complete," Mr Spiteri said.

"So, you will have appointment number one, appointment number two, you have your SOA that you have [written], and you have medicals that need to be followed up for clarification.

"If you can use tele-underwriting - you do the short form application and then the tele-underwriting looks after the application and the follow-up of underwriting - you are generally going to save yourself anywhere from two to four hours' worth of work.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"What that does is it gives you a fair bit more time to source your next lead, or your next client."

Mr Spiteri added that as well as improving efficiency within the business, advisers will be able to place responsibility for completing the application with a third party.

"Generally, that third party will record the conversation - so it is not going to be a 'he said, she said' situation in the event of a claim," he said.

"We look at tele-underwriting as extremely efficient in the event of a claim not being paid out. Sure, they are going to be disenchanted with the adviser, but the onus is really with the insurer and the tele-underwriter rather than the client and the adviser."

Mr Spiteri acknowledged, however, that some advisers may feel they are losing control of the advice and application process.

"They may perceive that the tele-underwriter is trying to prompt additional questions and seek out some stuff that an adviser would not normally put on an application which, in turn, may give negative consequences of getting that application through," he said.

"However, you have the new brigade of advisers which use it every day of the week. They see it as efficiency, they see it as the blame game is not between the adviser and the client if there is a dispute; it is between them and the insurer based on what the client has said to the insurer."

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook.
Find us on Twitter for the latest updates

Subscribe to our Newsletter

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy